I will admit that I have never been a fan of the above pictured jug-eared, tree-hugging twit. I never liked Diana either, but the way this bastard treated her was way out of order and clearly turning her over in favour of a woman closely resembling the back end of a horse just proves he has no taste and bad eyesight!
Anyway, having said all that there have been a couple of things lately which convince me that King Charles III would be as big a disaster as the first two Kings of the same name. Whatever was Liz thinking of when she named him Charles?..
Firstly, there were the revelations that in order to set an example to his future subjects in this time of national financial crisis he increased his 'professional' expenditure by some 18% last year. Well. I wouldn't mind that as a pay rise, would you? And to make things worse, the staff at the Duchy of Cornwall are on a pay freeeze.
And just to rub salt in the wound, who has given him this extra money? Joe Muggins - the British taxpayer!
Secondly, there was the revelation that he doesn't know his place. Blair apparently resented his continual politcal interference and now we find out that he has been calling ministers in so that he can lobby them to support his views on architecture, ecology, global warming, aid and God knows what else.
This country is a constitutional monarchy. This means that the head of state does not interfere in politics. That is left to the elected representatives of the people.
Basically, Charlie, that means follow the example set by your mother and keep your nose out of it!
The best hope for the UK is that his mother will live as long as her mother and that he will have well and truly popped his clogs before he can ascend to the throne. I can't help feeling that King William V will do a far better job...
6 comments:
Great picture of the idiot!
You forgot to mention his rather limited mental capacity (he's thick) and his desire to be reborn as a tampon.
Not that I hold any brief for hm, but...
He is a Privy Councillor and can engage with other Privies and reps of HMG- it is a requirement of the job apparently.
He is not Head of State and is not bound by the convention of non-interference (non-interference in public anyway).
Lastly, he can pick his own Coronation name - the reason why KG6 was called Bertie by his Mrs. My money is an each-way og George or Edward.
Just a bit of fun.
I'm a republican so the twattiest royal who really is going to make a complete Horlicks of the whole thing really ought to be my favourite for the throne. In theory that is. In practice the Prince of Fails is such an complete fucknuts that I can't say I'm looking forward to it. Trouble is, I'm no fan of his mum either and evidence has begun to appear that Wills has picked up his greenie religion. Frankly one of the corgis might be the best option.
...he can pick his own Coronation name...
King Size Lil-let the First?
"never been a fan of the jug-eared, tree-hugging twit" - would never have guessed...
1. Compared to the millions stolen from the public purse by our elected politicians his expenses are a drop in the ocean and he does far more for the country than the Westminster pigs.
2. "the head of state does not interfere in politics" - quite true but he isn't and is a PC to boot so should interfere all he likes.
Why do you think that a lager loving party animal with a 'drop in if you can be bothered' job, no obvious signs of life upstairs and a penchant for social climbing workshy sticks would be a better bet as king?
You seem to be confusing Wills with Harry.
Anyway, whatever you say I still think the bloke is a cunt, and in my humble opinion does more harm to the reputation of this country than good. He's a bloody laughing stock!
There is nothing wrong with royalty that a good guillotine won't fix.
With the EU bon-homie perhaps the French could lend us theirs.
After-all last time we had to use an axe. Hardly a technological solution for this day and age.
Post a Comment